Daily research update
we backtested it — Sharpe 0.43 · quant relevance 0.99
The paper uses forecasts of market concentration and dispersion to allocate dynamically between equal-weighted and capitalization-weighted US equity portfolios. It reports out-of-sample returns after transaction costs. The strategy can be tested on available US equities, but historical S&P 500 membership and the pre-2010 portion of its backtest cannot be replicated.
quant relevance 0.96
The paper proposes an anytime-valid statistical governance layer for adaptive investment-factor discovery: proposed cross-sectional factors are admitted only when post-submission rank-IC evidence passes online multiple-testing control. A CSI 500 walk-forward study evaluates factor admissions, retirement and portfolio outcomes, including trading costs and Sharpe ratios.
quant relevance 0.90
The paper compares cryptocurrency volatility forecasts across training losses and models, then assesses their implications for one-day Gaussian Value-at-Risk. Its practical finding is that differences between loss functions often reflect persistent calibration of the volatility level rather than better day-to-day volatility dynamics, with implications for risk targeting and VaR-based sizing.
4 more papers written up in this period. Open the Quant Paper Radar →
Backtest and model results are research artifacts, not live trading results and not a guarantee of future performance. Informational and educational purposes only. Not individualised investment advice.