Daily research update
we backtested it — Sharpe -0.29 · quant relevance 0.98
The paper derives an alpha-aware execution horizon and a front-loaded schedule under concave impact and Hurst-scaled price risk. Its reported 10–17% cost saving comes from its execution-cost model, not measured trading performance.
we backtested it — Sharpe -0.73 · quant relevance 0.98
The paper evaluates news-topic attention and stock exposures as cross-sectional return signals for US equities. Its reported ensemble performance does not significantly beat a price-only benchmark. A forward-shifted version can be backtested, but the platform cannot reproduce the paper's early training sample or its NoLBERT comparison.
quant relevance 1.00
The paper identifies executable arbitrage portfolios across logically related Polymarket contracts and simulates them. Its reported profits depend on contract-resolution rules and full-depth order books.
The rest of the batch
Using hourly Bitcoin technical indicators, the study trains a Random Forest and reports trading results based on probability thresholds and trailing stops.
and 10 more · see the full radar
Backtests are hypothetical research results; forward-portfolio figures are a live record. Neither is a guarantee of future performance. Research and education only: not individualised investment advice, not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.