Daily research update
we backtested it — Sharpe -0.62 · quant relevance 1.00
The study uses CNNs to rank stocks by next-month factor-hedged residual returns, using RGB images of stock, hedge, and residual paths. Its strongest reported specification earns 0.82% gross monthly excess return with a 0.97 annualized Sharpe ratio; profitability depends on hedge estimation and trading costs.
quant relevance 0.96
The paper develops a reward-alignment audit for mean–variance portfolio reinforcement learning, separating reward misspecification from actor and critic errors. Controlled experiments improve decision alignment, while historical US industry-portfolio tests preserve fitted allocation targets without improving realised investment performance.
quant relevance 0.92
The study derives optimal collective portfolio policies under a weighted probability constraint covering multiple terminal-wealth thresholds. It directly addresses investment allocation and downside protection, but its numerical welfare results are model-based rather than measured trading performance.
The rest of the batch
The study identifies latency-sensitive trading through limit orders priced exactly at the prevailing opposite-side best quote and finds predictive information for mid-quote returns over 100 milliseconds to ten minutes.
and 4 more · see the full radar
Backtests are hypothetical research results; forward-portfolio figures are a live record. Neither is a guarantee of future performance. Research and education only: not individualised investment advice, not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.