Research
A continuously updated feed of research papers that pass our automated relevance screening for systematic trading — plus every paper we have published a review of, whatever it scored. Particular focus on alpha hypotheses that can be formalised and tested. The Radar also covers portfolio construction, market risk and execution where the research is directly relevant to systematic investment processes. Follow new entries by RSS.
15,697 papers screened · 250 on the radar · 83 shown
Against the background of increasing volatility and complex risk factors in global markets, options and futures have become important instruments for risk hedging and uncertainty management.
PAPER REPORTS · Futures hedged portfolio, 2019-2024: annualized return 7.95%, annualized volatility 10.28%, hedging efficiency 46.87%,… · Option hedged portfolio, 2019-2024: annualized return 8.31%, annualized volatility 8.76%, hedging efficiency 54.73%,…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.74 · Return +83.0% · Max DD -47.8%
Generative models of limit orderbook (LOB) data have advanced rapidly, but their evaluation often focuses on stylised facts and selected market statistics.
We develop a geometric theory of arbitrage-free implied variance surface dynamics.
PAPER REPORTS · Out-of-sample RMSE(delta a2) improvement of full (beta,eta,psi) model over SSR-only: 17-21% at 3M-6M (215.7 vs 272.8 at… · Out-of-sample RMSE(delta a1) improvement of adding eta: 1-4% versus SSR-only at 1M-6M, essentially flat at 12M
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.84 · Return -0.1% · Max DD -0.1%
Shariah-compliant equity screening provides a transparent setting in which institutional rules determine who may own a stock.
PAPER REPORTS · SC Malaysia inclusions, 295 continuously listed liquidity-qualified events, Nov 2013-Nov 2025: matched… · 410 continuously listed inclusions (no turnover floor): +0.896pp [0,10] (p_date=0.127; p_wild=0.134) and +1.458pp…
Financial volatility is regime dependent, yet incorporating regime information into neural networks can also destabilize training. This paper asks where such information should enter a neural cross-sectional volatility forecasting model.
PAPER REPORTS · U.S. panel, 30 walk-forward windows Apr 2018 - Oct 2025, mean over 30 seeds: IC 0.5469 +/- 0.0012, ICIR 6.14 +/- 0.06,… · IC advantage over capacity-matched MLP-L: +0.0048 full sample (p<1e-4); +0.0207 top market-vol decile; +0.0322 COVID…
Financial forecasting models are typically developed in full precision, yet production deployment often requires low-precision inference to reduce memory and computational cost. Post-training quantization (PTQ) enables such deployment without retraining.
PAPER REPORTS · FP32 mean daily IC (cross-sectional Spearman, averaged over test dates, 2018-2025 walk-forward): TSMixer 0.490±0.043,… · Baseline mean daily IC over the same folds: pooled HAR 0.408, persistence (trailing 5-day realized vol) 0.315
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.41 · Return +41.7% · Max DD -37.2%
Large language models can extract richer signals from financial news than fixed sentiment lexicons, and recent work has explored feeding such signals into portfolio construction.
PAPER REPORTS · Sharpe 2.33, annualized return 95.9%, cumulative net 100.1%, max drawdown -18.3% — pure beta, GPT-4o mini, Student-t,… · Sharpe 2.44, annualized 100.0%, net 106.9%, max DD -18.3% — same configuration at 50 bps (2025)
This paper investigates whether textual tone derived from large language models (LLMs) can predict future stock returns. Using Korean news articles, we employ five LLMs to extract textual tones: BERT (KrFinBERT), DistilBERT, RoBERTa, ELECTRA, and Llama3.
PAPER REPORTS · BERT (KrFinBERT) equal-weighted quintile High-Low: 0.242% per day, t=3.772 (5.324% per month), May 2023-May 2024, gross… · BERT High-Low Fama-French 3-factor alpha 0.232% per day (t=3.582); 5-factor alpha 0.232% per day (t=3.566), same…
This study analyzes the microstructural mechanisms through which the rapidly expanding single-stock leveraged ETFs in the Korean capital market impede the price discovery function and amplify endogenous volatility.
Volatility is a fundamental characteristic of financial markets and plays a crucial role in investment decision-making, portfolio management, and financial risk assessment.
PAPER REPORTS · Out-of-sample RMSE 0.009552 (GARCH(1,1)) vs 0.009670 (EGARCH(1,1)), 230 one-step-ahead rolling forecasts, 30 May… · Out-of-sample MAE 0.007521 (GARCH) vs 0.007406 (EGARCH)
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.83 · Return +37.3% · Max DD -11.4%
The Triadic Stress Index (TSI) takes a network index whose four factors were first observed in soil microbiome co-occurrence networks and applies it, without alteration, to the correlation network of financial assets.
PAPER REPORTS · Out-of-sample F1@p90 = 0.447 (TSI with memory, 2016-2026, 897 windows, OFR 23-window crisis list; no transaction costs… · F1 gap vs Absorption Ratio = 0.273 (0.447 vs 0.174) out of sample 2016-2026, block-bootstrap 95% CI [0.095, 0.392],…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.87 · Return +229.7% · Max DD -46.7%
A new class of software systems is transforming investment analysis. Large language model agents assembled into collaborative team structures including analysts, researchers, and risk managers are increasingly deployed across financial markets.
PAPER REPORTS · Author's own prior human practice (not the AI framework): 127.17% return vs 50.67% benchmark within sixteen months,… · Ranked first among 276 comparable peer funds nationally through the 2020 market-stress period (peer average negative);…
In this paper we investigate the information content of the lower part of the spectrum of financial correlation matrices, as a source of information on market synchronization.
OUR BACKTEST · CAPITAL EXHAUSTED · FAILED SANITY CHECK
The daily return of a stock is often restricted to an exchange-imposed band to curb extreme fluctuations. Any attempted price movement beyond this band is clipped, leaving an unobserved excess.
Foundation models for time series forecasting demonstrate impressive zero-shot generalization but often underperform on specialized domains such as high-frequency finance.
PAPER REPORTS · Mean per-day correlation 0.3730 (GatedLinear+RF, 40 test days per stock, Dec 2024-Jan 2026 sample, transaction costs… · Pooled correlation 0.5972 and cross-day correlation 0.5631 (GatedLinear+RF, same 40-day test window)
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.42 · Return -0.6% · Max DD -0.8%
We develop a certified, scalable approximation for high-dimensional Wasserstein distributionally robust portfolio optimization. For expected-utility maximization under order-one Wasserstein ambiguity, standard duality yields a semi-infinite convex program.
PAPER REPORTS · ε=10^-2 (best DRO policy), 476-asset monthly rebalanced, 2021-2025, no transaction costs: cumulative return 3.64,… · ε=10^-4, 2021-2025, no costs: CR 4.77, σ 0.45, SR 0.93, MDD 0.38, Calmar 1.12
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.63 · Return +106.7% · Max DD -45.0%
Current portfolio construction methods are either agnostic to the effects of idiosyncratic shocks (standard factor models) or to the latent data structure driving systematic returns (recent graph-based approaches).
PAPER REPORTS · Contagion Cut (proposed): CAGR 21.0%, Sharpe 1.07, Calmar 0.611, Jan 2019-Mar 2026, 0 bps transaction costs · Contagion Cut: Sharpe 1.04 at 10 bps, 1.01 at 20 bps, 0.929 at 50 bps (CAGR 20.5%, 19.9%, 18.3%), Jan 2019-Mar 2026
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.75 · Return +143.1% · Max DD -40.3%
Predicting financial asset returns remains one of the most difficult challenges in empirical finance, driven by the low signal-to-noise ratio and the semi-strong form of market efficiency.
PAPER REPORTS · Sector LSTM (main 3-layer, k=10, 1995-2024): mean daily long-short return 0.100% before costs, Newey-West t = 7.81,… · Sector LSTM appendix figures (after 2bp per half turn): mean daily return 0.053%, t-statistic 4.106, annualized return…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.03 · Return -9.6% · Max DD -140.3%
This paper studies the investment and insurance strategies of defined-contribution (DC) pension plans under the mean-variance framework. We consider a stochastic environment with time-varying interest rates, contributions, and mortality risk.
Financial sentiment classifiers are commonly evaluated against human labels, but strong linguistic performance does not necessarily imply economically useful return predictability. This study separates these questions through two experiments.
PAPER REPORTS · One-day mean rank IC, 2019 Benzinga S&P 100 sample: FinBERT 0.0143 (largest), Financial-RoBERTa 0.0141, Naive Bayes… · FinBERT one-day long–short: gross total return 12.96%, annualized Sharpe 1.11, max drawdown -6.37% (2019, gross — no…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -1.16 · Return -61.4% · Max DD -64.2%
Automated market makers (AMMs) are typically interpreted and evaluated as decentralized exchanges.
PAPER REPORTS · VBIAX, monthly TE, Jan 2, 2014 – Jun 30, 2026: G3M Pareto-dominates (higher CAGR and lower TE) for gamma in [2.73%,… · EQL NAV, economic mandate, Jun 19, 2018 – May 29, 2026: G3M dominates for gamma in [3.22%, 7.09%]
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.71 · Return +133.0% · Max DD -42.0%
We develop a unified modeling framework that connects two distinct types of bubbles defined in the literature: the rational bubbles (aka P-bubbles), and the local martingale bubbles (aka Q-bubbles).
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.47 · Return +220.6% · Max DD -131.6%
We ask a representative sample to write prompts seeking spending and investing advice from LLMs, then simulate the lifetime effects of following the advice under realistic asset and labor market conditions.
Factor structures are central to empirical work in economics and finance, and are usually used to model time-varying unobserved heterogeneity through interactive fixed effects (IFE).
We introduce data-driven measures of high-frequency trading (HFT) that distinguish between liquidity-supplying and liquidity-demanding strategies.
Recently, it has been proposed to model the microstructure noise in prices by a continuous-time process with continuous sample paths that are rougher than those of a standard Brownian motion.
When do outcome records carry enough signal to support reliable inferences about skill? When they do not, what should evaluators substitute? The framework answering the first question characterizes any decision domain with two parameters: the noise reflected…
Recent advances in Generative AI have substantially improved financial sentiment analysis through post-trained financial large language models (LLMs).
PAPER REPORTS · FinSMART (static): cumulative return 264.9%, annualized return 91.5%, Sharpe 1.97, Sortino 2.40, Calmar 4.23, RankIC… · FinSMART (periodically retrained every 6 months): cumulative return 406.2%, annualized return 125.7%, Sharpe 2.41,…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -0.46 · Return -48.2% · Max DD -75.2%
We derive a mesoscopic model for optimal execution with limit orders that incorporates microstructural features of passive price impact.
PAPER REPORTS · Baseline simulation, η=0: mean P&L $320 (95% CI 301–339), mean implementation shortfall −$35 (CI −37 to −34), mean… · Simulation with η=0.005: mean P&L $71 (CI 49–93), shortfall −$19 (CI −21 to −17), final inventory 1,928 shares, trading…
Parent-order execution is a core problem in algorithmic trading, where the goal is to split a large order into smaller orders while reducing execution costs.
PAPER REPORTS · Aggressive setting, April 2026, DS-v4-f: value-weighted price performance -2.26 bps vs TWAP benchmark price, i.e. · Passive setting, April 2026, DS-v4-f: -3.92 bps wbp, +1.07 bps vs TWAP and +0.71 bps vs strongest baseline; 100%…
The distribution of a normal mean-variance mixture depends on the law of its positive mixing variable. We compare six parametric mixing laws with a grid nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator under the same determinant identification constraint.
PAPER REPORTS · Model-based lower-envelope CPT value at the robust optimum: -0.04478 at 5% annual reference return; -0.09245 at 10%… · Empirical holdout CPT value at the robust weights: -0.04867 at 5% reference; -0.10049 at 10% reference (holdout 483…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.13 · Return +0.1% · Max DD -0.2%
The Observable Matrix Dynamics (OMD) approach monitors the time development of complex non-linear systems through the trajectory of a fixed-size distance matrix and its spectrum.
PAPER REPORTS · Early-warning ROC AUC (the paper's own signal, causal trailing 126-day features, label = forward peak-to-trough…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe 0.69 · Return +120.4% · Max DD -33.3%
Gaussian Boson Sampling (GBS) provides a native photonic quantum heuristic for sampling dense subgraphs from adjacency matrices, offering a scalable physical approach to combinatorial graph search problems.
PAPER REPORTS · {"costs": "zero transaction costs and zero price impact assumed", "period": "2020 (trading effectively April 2020… · {"costs": "zero transaction costs and zero price impact assumed", "period": "2020", "sharpe": "2.050 ± 0.190",…
OUR BACKTEST · Sharpe -1.00 · Return -5.8% · Max DD -6.2%